Conducting a good literature search, especially for a systematic review, requires you to be methodical, transparent, and reproducible. The table below provides an overview of the search process and tips for ensuring that process goes smoothly.
Concept |
Tips and Considerations |
Before you begin, think about:
- Has this review already been published?
- Do you have a clear focused topic/question?
|
- Is your scope reasonable?
- Search several databases; limit to review articles
|
What type of review are you writing?
- e.g. narrative review, systematic review, background for a research article
|
- Check standards for the type of review you’re writing
- Look at reviews published in your target journal
|
Comprehensive Search
- Search multiple databases
- Search by topic
- Citation tracking for key articles
- How do you know you’re done?
- Red flags: look for patterns
|
- Subject specific database(s) and multidisciplinary database(s)
- e.g. PubMed or Ovid, PSYCInfo, CINAHL
- Identify concepts and search terms (subject headings, textwords)
- Use a concept table to organize search terms
- Use Web of Science and Google Scholar
- Related records in Web of Science
- Be conscious of saturation
- All/most from single research group or perspectives
- No recent publications
|
Document your search process
- Set up system before you start
|
- Use a concept table to organize search terms
- Track databases you search
- Track search strategies used
- Refine your searches
|
Do final searches
|
- Use refined strategy to search all databases
- Capture search as run (e.g. save in database or screen shot)
|
Manage what you find
- Create accounts in each database order to save results
- Use EndNote
|
- PubMed or Ovid
- Web of Science
- CINAHL, PSYCInfo, etc.
- Endnote
|
Keep current
- Discover new articles on your topic as they are published
|
- Save final searches and set up alerts
|